25 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > categorisation
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
25 Results
filtered by
Tags > categorisation
Clear All
The tracking of biodiversity relevant investments is possible using the cohesion policy monitoring system.
Updated
September 4 2020
Views
9,266
Cohesion policy is the EU's policy to support the reduction of social economic and territorial disparities - the "catching up funds". Interactive sankey visualisation allow stakeholders to explore and compare the detailed investment themes across the funds, countries, thematic objectives and detail thematic "intervention fields".
Updated
February 27 2020
Views
13,864
#DYK? climate action is supported with major EU cohesion policy investments
Updated
April 7 2021
Views
27,884
Cohesion policy comprises EUR 355 billion of EU budget delivered in 3 funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund and ESF/YEI. They support investment is a wider range of themes. To understand, monitor and communicate on the policy we use a multi dimensional information system.
Updated
September 10 2020
Views
23,100
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme annual Implementation reports (AIR) as at end 2014. The dataset is not a final picture of what was financed during 2007-2013. The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,105
The categorisation system for Cohesion Policy Funds 2014-2020 (ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund) foresees 123 Intervention Field codes for the actions or activities financed by the three Funds. The planned allocation to those codes provide detailed thematic / sectoral information on the planned investments by theme.
The planned financial allocations are to be found in this dataset https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/ESIF-2014-2020-categorisation-ERDF-ESF-CF/9fpg-67a4
This lookup dataset maps the 123 intervention field codes to higher level "cross cutting" themes such as "climate change", "innovation" "enterprise support" and others combinations. It provides the Commission"s recommend list of codes to be used when assessing the financial allocations to these cross cutting themes.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,114
This file contains categorisation data from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes and in particular it **COMPARES PLANNED AMOUNTS TO IMPLEMENTED INVESTMENTS**.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted. The implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. This dataset contains data to end-2016 and end 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted. The implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. This dataset contains data to end-2016 and end 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on 3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare. In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on 3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare. In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
Updated
March 1 2021
Views
353
This dataset contains the cumulative financial data reported by all cohesion policy fund programmes in its raw form with financing (costs supported and expenditure reported) linked to specific categorisation dimension codes.
The dataset does *not* contain information on planned spending by categorisation codes. Becasue of the data structure that is not possible in this format.
The following categoriation dataset for 2014-2020 are related:
- Categorisation Planned: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/d/9fpg-67a4
- Categorisation planned vs implemented (aggregated by priority axis and presented by individual dimension codes ): https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/d/3kkx-ekfq
- Categorisation Planned: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/d/9fpg-67a4
- Categorisation planned vs implemented (aggregated by priority axis and presented by individual dimension codes ): https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/d/3kkx-ekfq
Updated
May 3 2021
Views
287
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme final implementation reports (FIR) as presented in the closure documeantation. The dataset is the best approximation of thematic content of what was financed during 2007-2013.
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
A version of this data as at the end of 2014 was previously published here: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-Categorisation-Projectselection-/b5xq-38ds
The planned categorisation amounts under certain dimension were also published in dataset for end-2008 and end-2015 : https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/SF-2007-2013-Categorisation-Planned-2008-and-2015/x2d8-jjj2
Updated
May 7 2021
Views
849
This dataset provides the *planned* EU allocation to categorisation system codes as adopted in ERDF, CF and ESF programmes at the end 2008 and the end of 2015.
The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to a categorisation dimension codes. The programme documents only provided planned financial information on three dimensions, namely;
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
The full categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
This data is of interest because it allows an analysis of time of the planned use of the EU support by 3 different dimensions. I show the detailed changes in thematic allocation between 2008 and 2015 allowing to look re-progamming.
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,059
Showing 1 to 10 of 25 results
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (3)
- 1994-1999 (3)
- 2000-2006 (3)
- 2007-2013 (149)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (125)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- air (1)
- air quality (31)
- airport (1)
- ambulances (1)
- annual (4)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (1)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (1)
- broadband (30)
- business development (29)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categorisation
- categorisation data (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (124)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (1)
- climate action (1)
- climate adaptation (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate tracking (1)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund (52)
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (19)
- communciation (6)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (3)
- coronavirus response (2)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (9)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (12)
- covid19 (6)
- crii (8)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (7)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- deprived communities (1)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (101)
- eaggf (5)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education infrastructure (30)
- efficiency (3)
- emergency services (1)
- emff (94)
- energy (32)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (31)
- eonomometric (4)
- equity (3)
- erdf (135)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (132)
- esf participation (34)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (19)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (4)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer, awareness, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, perception, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, priorities, eu, regional, policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (10)
- evaluations (1)
- expenditure (10)
- fead (7)
- finances implemented (5)
- financial instruments (4)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (7)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (8)
- flying flags (2)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (18)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (3)
- funds (4)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (2)
- health (6)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (30)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (4)
- historic payments (6)
- hospitals (1)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (9)
- in profile (1)
- index (5)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (8)
- indice (1)
- inequality (1)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (32)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (15)
- intervention fields (5)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (4)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- labour market (29)
- large enterprises (1)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loans (2)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (1)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (5)
- monitoring (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (30)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (1)
- nuts (5)
- nuts 2 (1)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts 3 (1)
- nuts allocation (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (8)
- nuts2 (5)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (2)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (1)
- over programming (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (5)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- planned (13)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- port (1)
- ports (30)
- ppe (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (1)
- public investment (2)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (31)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (4)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (5)
- regions (1)
- regression (2)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (33)
- research institutes (1)
- reserve (1)
- resources (1)
- review (1)
- risk prevention (7)
- road (31)
- rtd (1)
- rtd activities (2)
- rtd infrastructure (2)
- rtdi (30)
- rup (1)
- rural (2)
- rural development (1)
- sanitation (1)
- scatterplot (1)
- science parks (2)
- scores (1)
- sdg 6 (1)
- sectoral data (1)
- sectors (2)
- selected (13)
- selected operations (1)
- selection rate (1)
- singaling (1)
- small enterprises (1)
- smart grids (1)
- smart growth (2)
- sme (1)
- sme financing (1)
- smes (35)
- social (1)
- social inclusion (29)
- social progress (1)
- social progress index (2)
- solidarity (2)
- sparsely populated (1)
- specific funds (2)
- specific objective (1)
- spending category (35)
- spi (4)
- start-ups (1)
- storms (2)
- story (2)
- story guide (1)
- strategies (1)
- structural funds (1)
- studies (1)
- success (2)
- sump (1)
- sustainable (3)
- ta (1)
- taiex (1)
- targets (3)
- technical assistance (30)
- technology (1)
- technology institutes (2)
- ten-t (1)
- territorial delivery mechanism (16)
- territorial development (1)
- territorial dimension (16)
- territory (2)
- territory types (1)
- thematic allocations (1)
- thematic data (1)
- thematic objective (88)
- thematic objectives (1)
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020 (13)
- theme (2)
- themes (1)
- theory based (1)
- theory based evaluation (1)
- time (1)
- time series (1)
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear (1)
- tourism (7)
- tourist attractions (1)
- track (1)
- transnational (1)
- transport (31)
- uban transport (1)
- universities (2)
- urban (2)
- urban development (1)
- urban mobility (1)
- urban transport (31)
- user guide (1)
- user survey (1)
- user surveysts (1)
- uwwtd (1)
- vaccination (1)
- vaccine (1)
- vaccines (1)
- variation (1)
- vcf (3)
- ventilators (1)
- venture capital (1)
- waste treatment (1)
- waste water (1)
- waste water treatment (30)
- water (1)
- water conservation (1)
- water framework (1)
- water supply (1)
- wellbeing (1)
- working capital (1)
- year (1)
- yei (97)
- z scores (1)